BASE 3-Rings – Weaker than you think?

Article by The Squirrel / Asylum Designs Team

Some jumpers like Gabriel Lott, WWL Target Champion, prefer sewn risers for BASE, as they are stronger than 3-rings
Some jumpers like Gabriel Lott, WWL Target Champion, prefer sewn risers for BASE, as they are stronger than 3-rings

3-Ring Risers are an option in BASE, which some jumpers choose

Because cutaways should never occur in flight, the reason that some jumpers opt for 3-Ring risers is to be able to quickly ditch their canopy, for instance in fast-moving water. There are very few instances in which cutting away your BASE canopy is important, and even fewer where speed is crucial and a hook knife might be inadequate (some would argue that, overall, sewn-in risers plus a hook knife is a safer option).

exceeding the limits of your equipment is easier than some jumpers may think

As we will see, exceeding the limits of your equipment is easier than some jumpers may think. In this article we'll review scenarios where worn equipment or excessive loading can bring aspects of your gear, specifically 3-ring risers, to the point of failure. Here’s some of what you should know when choosing the type of risers that you jump…

First of all, nothing written about 3-rings would be complete without homage to Bill Booth. Thanks, Bill.

In 2015, we tested a variety of existing risers that were available on the market, and saw a range of strengths in the current products intended for skydiving and BASE.

Sewn risers showing the harness main lift web junction
Sewn risers showing the harness main lift web junction
Typical 3-ring BASE risers
Typical 3-ring BASE risers

In 3-Ring riser construction, geometry is a critical factor. Even a small variance of 1-2mm of ring spacing or loop length will have a significant effect on total riser strength. The spec must be consistent across all factors, from ring spacing to loop length to the radius of the main webbing bight (which is affected by how the webbing is sewn and folded in addition to any reinforcement added). The manufacturing process for Mini-Rings is less forgiving than Large-Rings, requiring tighter manufacturing tolerances, but the strength of properly constructed Mini-Rings is not less than Large-Rings.

It is very important to note that the strength of any equipment declines over time, regardless of the materials used. This degradation in strength can be severe, causing risers to fail even under “normal” use. BASE equipment has a lifespan which must be respected. To put it simply: Older equipment is more prone to failure.

Older equipment is more prone to failure

How strong should a riser be?

Our testing has shown that the upper limit for type-8 3-ring systems is in the range of 4000-4500 pounds (lbs). Type-8 webbing is worth around 4000 lbs, or 18 kiloNewtons (kN). However, many BASE risers will fail at less.

This article is based on load testing and research completed in 2015, by Squirrel LLC. A sampling of our load testing is shown below. Some Type-8 risers intended for BASE jumping and currently in use failed at loads of as little as 11 kN or 2500 lbs force (risers with several years of use). Based on current trends and the likely future of BASE, we believe that BASE 3-ring risers should be shown more respect both in terms of lifespan (heavily used or aged 3-Ring risers should be retired) and manufacturing (tolerances can be reduced in many cases).

load testing
heavily used or aged 3-Ring risers should be retired

It is important to note that there is a difference between 3-ring risers manufactured for skydiving, and those manufactured for BASE. In skydiving, the requirements for overall strength in the system are lower, as the forces exerted are generally lower. Secondly, it is critical that skydive 3-rings are easily releasable under load in order to facilitate safe cutaways. BASE jumping 3-ring risers are not designed to be cut away in flight, which means an easy cutaway is secondary to overall strength.

Case Study

On the Limits of 3 Ring Type-8 Risers for BASE

From the laboratory testing described above, we know that well-designed and well-constructed Type-8 risers will fail at approximately 19 kN (4271 lbs) force in new condition. It is a fact that use and aging can (and will) significantly reduce the strength of riser systems.

For used risers (i.e. risers with 5-7 years of use), a reasonable expectation of strength would be in the range of 15-17 kN. For the purposes of this illustration, let’s assume a outer-limit, but not necessarily extreme, example: Jumper exit weight of 230 lbs (~210 lb jumper, plus all equipment). In this case, the following thresholds would be expected:

Type-8 Riser Strength (3-ring section):

New Risers: Strength 19 kN (4271 lbs), Exit weight 230 lbs = 18.6 G force to fail

Used Risers: Optimistic Estimate, 17 kN (3822 lbs), Exit weight 230 lbs = 16.6 G force to fail.

Used Risers: Less Optimistic Estimate, 15 kN (3372 lbs) Exit weight 230 lbs = 14.7 G force to fail.

Let’s start with the first scenario, assuming perfect, new equipment. How much is 18.6 G?

G force is a measure of deceleration over time. In the case of a parachute opening, there are many variables to consider which will determine the amount of time consumed during deceleration.

g force and kn

It should be noted that the time lapse of a parachute opening, when discussing opening force, is not measured from PC extraction or inflation. It is measured from line stretch to lower surface expansion, and the deceleration is from freefall speed to the typical vertical speed of an open parachute (10-15 mph).

For a jumper with 230 lb exit weight, wearing street clothes, a 130 mph freefall speed would be a reasonable estimate.

a note on airspeed

If the speed is 130 mph, and the opening occurs over a 1s period, decelerating to 10 mph (approximate vertical speed of parachute flight), the result = 5.47 G (for 1-second opening).

Anecdotally, a 1 second slider up opening (calculated from line stretch to lower surface expansion) may feel brisk, but not dramatic or unusual.

A “one-one-thousand” count parachute opening is usually slider up, and airspeed-controlled. This would be typical with an un-vented or lightly-vented canopy deployed after tracking suit or wingsuit flight, with a mesh slider UP.

A terminal and slick opening will usually be completed in much less than 1 second from the time of line stretch to parachute flight.

If we add in a ZP leading edge and extensive lower surface venting and introduce the possibility of an out of sequence deployment causing premature slider descent or mis-rigging (canopy packed slider down), then the time consumed from line stretch to lower surface expansion will be much less.

If the opening time from line stretch to lower surface expansion occurs over 0.25 seconds, with a start speed of 130 mph and an end speed of 10mph, the result is 21.9 G (5037 lbs), which is above the tolerances for even a new 3-ring riser if loaded at 230 lbs exit weight. With degradation from 5-7 years of use, the force applied is more than 1000 lbs higher than the expected riser strength.

the force applied is more than 1000 lbs higher than the expected riser strength

Note that this assumes an asymmetric loading of the parachute, where one riser is loaded before the other. A stable and symmetric deployment will result in the total load being shared across both riser groups. However, for the purposes of testing and design, we have to assume sub-optimal conditions where one riser is loaded heavily before the other, as a result of an unstable or asymmetric deployment.

We’ve all heard the term “instant canopy”. What do we mean by that? How fast can this really occur? For a terminal slider down opening, 0.25 seconds from line stretch to lower surface expansion is not an exaggeration, and has been observed in testing and field use.

Even if we give the opening more time, being completely generous and assuming a not very hard opening: With 0.4s opening time the result is 13.7 G, which is uncomfortably close to the estimated value of a well-used riser if exit weight is 230 lbs. 


Testing Data From Parachute Load Tests:

Drop test A, Dacron line set, 125 kg, at 180 kph
Drop test A, Dacron line set, 125 kg, at 180 kph

Slider Off Drop Test A

Test Load: 125 kg (275 lbs)

Airspeed: 180 kph (112 mph)

Maximum G-force: 14.4

Drop test B, Dacron line set, 100 kg, at 180 kph
Drop test B, Dacron line set, 100 kg, at 180 kph

Slider Off Drop Test B

Test Load: 100 kg (220 lbs)

Airspeed: 180 kph (112 mph)

Maximum G-force: 19.75

At 180 kph (112 mph) speed at opening, no slider (slider down), load force spiked at 19.75 G during a recorded deceleration time of 0.25 - 0.3 seconds (approximately 7 video frames at 25fps).

Lessons

The above contains math that, while simple, may not be knowledge expected of a beginner jumper.

However, the basics are clear and simple and must be considered conventional wisdom:

Exit weight, freefall speed, and equipment configuration must be accounted for and understood. It is completely unreasonable to assume that any equipment can or should withstand any possible force. Used and aged equipment is more prone to failure. All equipment has a finite lifespan, which is determined by use, age, and exposure.

10 Critical Questions You Should Know the Answers to

  1. What is the usage history of my equipment? How old is it, how much and how hard has it been used, and where has it been stored in the past?
  2. What does it mean to be packed slider down for a long delay, or terminal airspeed?
  3. What is the difference between a BASE jump and a single parachute skydive - are the opening speeds often different, i.e., higher?
  4. What does “terminal”, and “slick”, mean for opening speed?
  5. How does “terminal” airspeed vary with exit weight, clothing, and air density?
  6. What effect does opening speed have on the forces applied to my equipment?
  7. What does it mean to be >200 lbs exit weight?
  8. How can asymmetric loading of my equipment result from an unstable deployment?
  9. Have I trained for the proper use of my parachute systems, for skydive and BASE? Do I know what proper use is, with regard to the limitations of my gear? Do I understand that my equipment does have limitations, which change over time?
  10. Have I practiced freefall stability control during deployment, and if so, how?
Sewn risers using CNC bartacks have almost double the strength of type-8 3-ring risers
Sewn risers using CNC bartacks have almost double the strength of type-8 3-ring risers

Article by The Squirrel / Asylum Designs Team

Note: This article is based on load testing and research completed in 2015, by Squirrel LLC. In January 2016 we shipped out 3-Ring risers to all of our harness/container system customers which consistently test out to >20kN and have an optional backup cable key to help prevent accidental release. You can read about them in the manual here.

This article was originally published on skydivemag

advertisement

advertisement